window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; window.dataLayer.push({"manifest":{"embeds":{"count":0,"types":{"youtube":0,"facebook":0,"tiktok":0,"dmn":0,"featured":0,"sendToNews":0},"video":false}}});
ment

arts entertainmentAdvice

Dear Miss Manners: Not everyone will smile at a camera

Dear Miss Manners: As a frequent tourist, I take lots of photos wherever I go. I try not to be intrusive, but it isn’t feasible to ask permission of anonymous people in public spaces, and U.S. courts have ruled that nobody has a right to privacy in such settings.

Everyone carries a phone these days. Candid photos are much more interesting than posed photos or photos without people.

I think it’s important to capture the people and settings that reflect our times. I do not sell them, but I share the best ones with friends.

I avoid taking photos of people who appear to be homeless or mentally ill, because it seems exploitative.

News Roundups

Catch up on the day's news you need to know.

Or with:

Perhaps what was once considered rude has become acceptable and prevalent. Perhaps there is a distinction between candid photos in public vs. private settings. In the latter case, it seems appropriate to share these with the people photographed, offer them copies and destroy any they deem offensive or unflattering.

In foreign countries, I’ve encountered people who took offense at public photos, but never in the U.S.

ment

Gentle Reader: Indeed, everyone has a camera. If you are photographing the public activity of our time, you must have countless pictures of countless people taking countless pictures — mostly of themselves.

Yet Miss Manners feels obliged to tell you that there are also many in the United States who dislike being photographed in public and private gatherings, but feel forced into it by photographers who are not as sensitive to their feelings as you seem to be. Often, they are reluctant to speak up.

Prevalent, yes; but not acceptable to all. It is a matter of respect, not of law.

ment

Dear Miss Manners: How should veterans reply when thanked for their service?

Gentle Reader: “Surely all of us do what we can.” Unspoken: “And what do you do?”

Dear Miss Manners: How do you respond to dinner guests who ask for items above and beyond those which are visibly on offer or verbally listed by the host?

For example: “Do you have brand X of water?” when the host is asking whether the guest would like some water (generic); or, “Do you have a particular alcohol?” when the host does not mention it specifically.

It seems rude to make the host look small by constantly denying availability or making him scramble to fill the guest’s demanding and precious requests.

Gentle Reader: Do you have a small fork Miss Manners could borrow? The word “constantly” is stuck in that sentence in an odd place, and it is going to bother her if she cannot get it out where she can have a look at it.

The problem, you see, is that she agrees with you that it is rude for a guest to attempt to show up their host by making impossible or inconsiderate demands. But so many brand names are now used generically that she needs an aspirin — and does not want a guest to be considered rude who was awkwardly asking if you had fizzy water.

The answer, if you do not, is, “I’m so sorry, I don’t. But I have this or that if you would like.”

ment

The features provided by Andrews McMeel Syndication are copyrighted material and all rights are reserved.

You may not reproduce any of these features or distribute them electronically, in print or otherwise without written permission from Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106, (800) 255-6734.

the conversation

Thank you for reading. We welcome your thoughts on this topic. Comments are moderated for adherence to our Community Guidelines. Please read the guidelines before participating.